CRO vs. A/B Testing: What's the Difference and Why It Matters for Your Business

Published on Jul 2, 2025

by Jonas Alves

Conversion Rate Optimisation (CRO) and A/B testing are closely related, but they’re not the same thing at all. Both are concerned with improving performance. Both rely on data. Both can impact key metrics like conversion rates, revenue per visitor, and retention. But understanding the distinction between CRO and A/B testing is more than just a matter of semantics; it’s pretty critical for organisations that are prioritising experimentation.  

What Is CRO vs. A/B Testing?

A/B testing is your most precise tool for validating ideas. It's a statistically sound method for comparing two or more versions of something—like a headline or a pricing layout—and learning which one performs better. What sets A/B testing apart is its rigor. It's not just about watching what users do. It's about learning why a change works and using causal inference and controlled comparisons to generate reliable insights.

At its best, A/B testing gives teams:

  • Confidence in their decisions

  • Clarity on trade-offs

  • Speed—without sacrificing scientific accuracy

And when paired with techniques like Group Sequential Testing and real-time monitoring, it becomes a fast and flexible way to move forward without guesswork. While many teams think they understand these terms, they often use them in subtly different ways.

  • Conversion Rate Optimisation (CRO) is a strategic, iterative process aimed at improving the percentage of users who complete a desired action on a website or app, whether that’s making a purchase, signing up for a newsletter, or completing a booking. It draws on a range of disciplines, including user research, UX design, analytics, copywriting, and behavioural psychology. CRO is about why users behave the way they do, and how we can improve the experience to influence those behaviours.

  • A/B testing, on the other hand, is a methodology and a tool used within the broader CRO process (and beyond) to make data-driven decisions. It involves showing different versions of a page or feature to separate user groups and measuring which performs better against a defined metric. Done properly, A/B testing gives you the statistical confidence to act on changes, rather than relying on instinct or opinion.

So while CRO might identify a pain point in your onboarding flow and propose a cleaner design, it’s A/B testing that helps you determine whether that new design actually performs better in the real world. In that sense, CRO and A/B testing aren’t competing approaches; they’re complementary. CRO is the what and the why. A/B testing is how you validate those ideas.

The Key Differences Between CRO and A/B Testing

CRO and A/B testing often work together, and understanding their differences helps teams avoid confusion. Here’s a side-by-side comparison to make things crystal clear:

Aspect

Conversion Rate Optimisation (CRO)

A/B Testing

Scope

Broad, strategic process to improve user experience and conversion rates

Narrow, tactical method to test specific changes

Purpose

Identify problems, form hypotheses, and propose solutions

Validate hypotheses through controlled experimentation

Approach

Insight-led: combines qualitative and quantitative research

Data-driven: relies on statistical methods and control groups

Timeframe

Ongoing and iterative

Typically short-term or campaign-specific, though it can feed into long-term strategy

Disciplines involved

Cross-functional: Product, Marketing, UX, Analytics, Design

Often more technical: Product, Engineering, Data Science

Tools & techniques

Heatmaps, user testing, surveys, heuristic analysis, analytics, A/B testing

Experimentation platforms, metrics tracking, statistical calculators

Output

Recommendations, design iterations, UX changes

Data-backed decisions on specific variants or changes

Common Misunderstandings

The distinction between CRO and A/B testing is often muddled up, and that confusion can lead to missed opportunities or misplaced expectations. These are a few of the most common misunderstandings we see in:

A/B testing is CRO, isn’t it?

Not quite. A/B testing is a powerful tool, but it is still just one method in a much larger optimisation process. A team that only runs tests without conducting the underlying research, customer analysis, or design thinking is unlikely to see transformative results.

CRO is just about button colors and headline tweaks!

It might start there, but mature CRO programmes go far deeper into identifying strategic friction points, optimising entire user flows, and influencing everything from pricing strategies to personalisation. It’s not just about micro-optimisation; it’s about understanding user behaviour and improving experiences holistically.

Aren’t A/B tests too slow or too risky?

When done properly, with sound statistical methods, effective tools, and clear guardrails, A/B testing can be fast and safe. It’s about giving teams the confidence to launch changes that actually work.

Misunderstanding the difference between Conversion Rate Optimisation (CRO) and A/B testing prevents teams from embedding a culture of experimentation in an organisation. When you’re clear on how each of them works, it’s much easier for marketing, product, UX, and data teams to collaborate. 

Where CRO and A/B Testing Work Together

While it’s important to understand the differences between CRO and A/B testing, the real magic happens when they’re working hand-in-hand. In a healthy experimentation culture, they’re not operating in silos—they’re part of a positive feedback loop.

Here’s how that typically works:

  1. CRO identifies an opportunity

Through research, analytics, or behavioral insight, the CRO team spots something worth investigating, a drop-off in onboarding, poor engagement with a product feature, or friction in the checkout flow.

  1. A hypothesis is formed

The team proposes a change. This might be a new layout, copy update, interaction pattern, or restructured journey, grounded in a clear rationale.

  1. A/B testing puts it to the test

Rather than making the change and hoping for the best, the team runs a controlled experiment. Half of the users see the new version, while the other half stays on the original, and the impact is measured against real-world behaviour.

  1. Insights are captured and shared

Whether the test “wins” or not, it generates learning. That learning feeds back into the CRO process, influencing future hypotheses and building a shared knowledge base.

This feedback loop creates an environment where decisions are based on data, not hunches, and where both successes and failures are seen as valuable inputs to the next round of optimisation.

Built for Testing. Designed for Strategy.

While CRO and A/B testing serve different purposes, they’re united by a shared ambition: to create better user experiences and drive measurable outcomes through continuous learning. The most successful digital businesses don’t treat them as either/or, but as complementary disciplines, each with its own strengths, and both essential to building a truly data-informed culture. Whether you’re running a single test or building a company-wide culture of experimentation, our platform gives you what most tools don’t: statistical integrity, real-time speed, and hands-on partnership.

Our platform gives you the tools to run rock-solid A/B tests and the workflows to turn those results into lasting product improvements. If your organisation is ready to go beyond gut-feeling and democratise experimentation in marketing, across product, design, and engineering, we’d love to show you how we can help. Book a demo and see what’s possible when your A/B testing platform is built for experimentation at scale.

Home

Benefits

Resources

About

Pricing

Benefits

Resources

About

Pricing